| Doctor | Date | Summary of Allegations |
|---|
DOYLE, Christopher Mississauga | May 2 Motion to vary Discipline Order | On September 29, 2009, the Discipline Committee found that Dr. Doyle committed an act of professional misconduct, in that he has engaged in conduct or an act or omission relevant to the practice of medicine that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional. The Committee ordered, inter alia, the Registrar to impose terms, conditions and limitations. On January 16, 2012, the Discipline Committee, further to a motion by Dr. Doyle, varied the order. |
CHUNG, Stanley Bo-Shui practice address unknown | Friday May 3 at 9:00am | - Sexual impropriety with a patient.
- Sexual abuse of a patient.
- Failed to maintain the standard of practice of the profession.
- Engaged in conduct or an act or omission relevant to the practice of medicine that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.
Incompetence.
|
ABAWI, Walid Toronto | May 6 and 8 May 21 Continuation | - Engaged in an act or omission relevant to the practice of medicine that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.
- Conduct unbecoming a physician.
|
MUHAMMAD, Naeem Hafiz London | May 9 Penalty hearing | On February 14, 2013, the Discipline Committee found that Dr. Muhammad committed professional misconduct: in that he has engaged in the sexual abuse of a patient; and, in that he has engaged in an act or omission relevant to the practice of medicine that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional. |
SOGBEIN, Olusola Olufemi Ottawa | May 13 | - Engaged in an act or omission relevant to the practice of medicine that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.
- Conduct unbecoming a physician.
- Having been found guilty of an offence that is relevant to his suitability to practice.
|
ONZUKA, Justin Fuminori Practice Address unknown | May 22 | - Having been found guilty of an offence that is relevant to his suitability to practice.
- Sexual abuse of patients.
- Engaged in an act or omission relevant to the practice of medicine that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.
|
MAYTHAM, James Connery Practice address unknown | May 23 Reprimand To be delivered in the Hearing Chamber on the first floor at 12:45 p.m. | On March 8, 2011, the Discipline Committee found that Dr. James Connery Maytham committed an act of professional misconduct in that he engaged in conduct or an act or omission relevant to the practice of medicine that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional. The Committee ordered, amongst other things, that Dr. Maytham attend before the panel to be reprimanded. |
McINNIS, James Edward Roland Wasaga Beach | May 24 | Engaged in conduct or an act or omission relevant to the practice of medicine that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional. |
RUDINSKAS, Leona Constance Weston | May 27-29 Continuation | - Failed to maintain the standard of practice of the profession.
- Engaged in conduct or an act or omission relevant to the practice of medicine that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.
- Incompetence.
|
NORIEGA, Eleazar Toronto | May 27 Penalty hearing | Penalty hearing On February 28, 2013, the Discipline Committee found that Dr. Eleazar Humberto Noriega committed an act of professional misconduct, in that he has engaged in conduct or an act or omission relevant to the practice of medicine that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional. |