Minnes, Bruce Gordon (CPSO#: 57197)

Current Status: Revoked: Discipline Committee as of 19 Feb 2016

CPSO Registration Class: None as of 19 Feb 2016

Indicates a concern or additional information


Former Name: No Former Name

Gender: Male

Languages Spoken: English

Education:Queen's University, 1986

Practice Information

Primary Location of Practice
Practice Address Not Available


Specialty Issued On Type
Pediatrics Effective: 05 Jun 1991 RCPSC Specialist

Postgraduate Training

Please note: This information may not be a complete record of postgraduate training.

Queen's University, 01 Jul 1986 to 30 Jun 1987
Other - Comprehensive Internship

University of Ottawa, 01 Jul 1987 to 30 Jun 1988
Resident 1 - Pediatrics

University of Ottawa, 01 Jul 1988 to 30 Jun 1989
Resident 2 - Pediatrics

University of Ottawa, 01 Jul 1989 to 30 Jun 1990
Resident 3 - Pediatrics

University of Ottawa, 01 Jul 1990 to 30 Jun 1991
Resident 4 - Pediatrics

University of Ottawa, 01 Jul 1991 to 30 Jun 1992
Clinical Fellow - Pediatrics

University of Ottawa, 01 Jul 1992 to 30 Jun 1993
Clinical Fellow - Pediatrics

Registration History

Action Issue Date
First certificate of registration issued: Postgraduate Education Certificate Effective: 01 Jul 1986
Transfer of class of registration to: Independent Practice Certificate Effective: 07 Jan 1988
Revoked: Discipline Committee. Effective: 19 Feb 2016

Previous Hearings

Committee: Discipline
Decision Date: 29 Sep 2014

On September 29, 2014, the Discipline Committee found that Dr. Bruce Gordon Minnes 
committed acts of professional misconduct, in that he has engaged in conduct or an act or acts 
relevant to the practice of medicine that, having regard to all the circumstances, would 
reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.  

The Hospital Allegations  
The Committee found that Dr. Minnes failed to observe appropriate boundaries in the hospital 
setting with respect to numerous workplace colleagues over an extended period of time.  
Regarding nurse B, Dr. Minnes would, on occasions in 2008 without explanation, put his arm on 
her shoulder. In early 2009, while she was on the phone, Dr. Minnes placed his hands on her 
head and leaned in to kiss the top of her head; on an occasion the following month, Dr. Minnes 
came up behind her and massaged her neck and back. On another occasion, in early 2009, 
while she was sitting down charting, Dr. Minnes put his hand on her shoulder.  
Dr. Minnes also behaved in an inappropriate and unprofessional manner with clinical manager 
D. In the early 2000’s, Dr. Minnes approached D with a smile, wrapped his arms around her 
tightly and lifted her off the ground.  
Regarding nurse C, on one occasion, Dr. Minnes came up behind her and started massaging 
her shoulders. He also pointed to or gently touched her collar area to make her look down and 
then he flicked his fingers up to touch her chin. She found this touching very annoying and 
uncomfortable and witnessed him do this to a new nurse in the department in the fall of 2011.  
On another occasion, Dr. Minnes took nurse C’s hand and kissed it. She told him this was 
inappropriate and not to touch her again in any way. He called the next day to apologize and 
stopped touching her hand and doing the finger flicking trick. However, nurse C continued to 
witness Dr. Minnes touch other staff on the back, shoulders and doing the “finger flicking” 
Nurse F, who began work in the department in approximately 2003, witnessed Dr. Minnes giving 
back rubs to female staff and in the past, saw Dr. Minnes play the finger flicking game with 
female staff.  
These interactions with Dr. Minnes made it uncomfortable for staff to work with him. In March 
2009, Chief of the Department of Paediatrics and other staff, met with Dr. Minnes to discuss 
nurse B’s complaint. In the context of discussing personal boundary issues, Dr. Minnes said that 
he recognized that at times he had difficulty exercising appropriate self-control and that at times 
colleagues had told him they were uncomfortable with his behaviour so he stopped. At that 
meeting, he acknowledged that he had been previously spoken to in October 2003 about 
complaints received about his inappropriate behaviour, including touching nurses in a manner 
that could be considered inappropriate and that he had been asked at that meeting to refrain 
from such action. At the hospital’s direction, Dr. Minnes took certain steps to try to address 
these concerns.  
Dr. Minnes admitted that the facts agreed to with respect the hospital allegations support a 
finding of disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional conduct against him.  

The Camp Allegations  
The camp allegations pertain to Dr. Minnes’ alleged actions in relation to Ms. A, a 17-year-old 
counsellor at Camp 2, where Dr. Minnes was volunteering as the camp physician, in the 
summer of 2007. It is alleged that Ms. A was Dr. Minnes’ patient, and that he engaged in the 
sexual abuse of his patient; and, that his conduct with respect to Ms. A would reasonably be 
regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.  
The Committee finds based on the evidence that there was no doctor-patient relationship 
between Dr. Minnes and Ms. A. She was not his patient on the date in July 2007. The 
Committee found that there was sexual contact between Dr. Minnes and Ms. A in Dr. Minnes’ 
living quarters attached to the infirmary. Ms. A had informally approached Dr. Minnes with 
respect to a foot injury. Dr. Minnes told her to drop by the infirmary. A few days later Ms. A 
encountered Dr. Minnes on what turned out to be his last day at camp. After casual 
conversation, he invited her to come to his cabin that evening to look at her foot and to have a 
glass of juice. Ms. A attended the infirmary; Dr. Minnes was in his living quarters. Ms. A entered 
his living quarters. Dr. Minnes made progressively intrusive advances towards her, enquiring 
about her sexual activities with her boyfriend, inviting her to sit on the couch beside him, putting 
his arm around her shoulder, placing her hand on his genitals over his pants, removing her shirt, 
fondling her breasts, rubbing himself against her buttocks, removing her shorts and attempting 
to remove her underwear. When Dr. Minnes attempted to remove her underwear, Ms. A told him 
she had to leave as it was late and she had responsibilities and left the cabin.  
The Committee found that the brief informal conversation about Ms. A’s foot did not establish a 
doctor-patient relationship. While Dr. Minnes, as camp physician, was responsible for providing 
medical service to both children and staff at the camp, he did not provide any medical services 
to Ms. A. She did not follow his initial advice to come to the infirmary prior to the date in July 
2007, and did not attend that evening out of concern for her foot (which was getting better). Dr. 
Minnes never properly examined her foot, he gave no medical advice and did not prescribe 
treatment and no record was made of Dr. Minnes’ brief discussion with Ms. A about her foot.  
While the Committee has found that there was no doctor-patient relationship, Dr. Minnes was 
nevertheless the camp doctor and 47 years old and Ms. A was a 17 year old camp counsellor, 
and he was in a position of authority vis-a-vis Ms. A. The Committee finds on the evidence that 
Dr. Minnes’ conduct with Ms. A, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be 
regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable, or unprofessional.  
On January 19, 2015, the Discipline Committee ordered and directed that:  
1. the Registrar revoke Dr. Minnes’ certificate of registration, effective immediately;  
2. Dr. Minnes appear before the Committee to be reprimanded, and that the reprimand be 
  recorded on the register; and  
3. the parties make written submissions with respect to the costs payable to the College, to be 
  exchanged and filed with the Hearings Office of the College, within 14 days of the date of this 
On February 18, 2015, Dr. Minnes appealed the decision of the Discipline Committee to the 
Superior Court of Justice (Divisional Court). Pursuant to ss.25(1) of the Statutory Powers 
Procedure Act, the decision of the Discipline Committee was stayed pending the outcome of the 

On October 9, 2015, the Discipline Committee ordered Dr. Minnes to pay costs to the College in 
the amount of $17,840.00 within 90 days of the date of this Order. 
On February 19, 2016, the Divisional Court of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed 
Dr. Minnes’ appeal. The Court awarded $7500.00 in costs to the College, which was an amount 
agreed to by the parties.

Decision: Download Full Decision (PDF)
Appeal: Appeal Dismissed
Hearing Date(s): January 15 to 17, May 12-16, 20, 21, 2014