Nadel, Mendel Robert (CPSO#: 25723)

Current Status: Active Member as of 26 Jun 1973

CPSO Registration Class: Restricted as of 16 Sep 2010

Indicates a concern or additional information


Former Name: No Former Name

Gender: Male

Languages Spoken: English

Education:University of Toronto, 1972

Practice Information

Primary Location of Practice
Suite 422
2065 Finch Avenue West
Toronto ON  M3N 2V7
Phone: (416) 746-1955
Fax: (416) 901-9834
Electoral District: 10
View Professional Corporation Information

Professional Corporation Information

Corporation Name: M.R. Nadel Medicine Professional Corporation

Certificate of Authorization Status: Issued Date:  Jun 04 2008

Dr. M. Nadel ( CPSO# 25723 )

Business Address:
422 - 2065 Finch Avenue West
Toronto ON  M3N 2V7
Phone Number: (416) 746-1955

Hospital Privileges

Hospital Location
Humber River Hospital,Wilson Site Toronto


Specialty Issued On Type
Obstetrics and Gynecology Effective: 16 Nov 1977 RCPSC Specialist

Registration History

Action Issue Date
First certificate of registration issued: Postgraduate Education Certificate Effective: 24 Jun 1972
Expired: Terms and conditions of certificate of registration Expiry: 24 Jun 1973
Subsequent certificate of registration Issued: Independent Practice Certificate Effective: 26 Jun 1973
Transfer of class of certificate to: Restricted certificate Effective: 16 Sep 2010
Terms and conditions imposed on certificate by member Effective: 16 Sep 2010

Practice Restrictions

Imposed By Effective Date Expiry Date Status  
member Effective: 16 Sep 2010 Active View Details [+]
            As  from  September 16, 2010, the following is imposed as a term, condition and
            limitation  on the certificate of registration held by Dr. Mendel Robert Nadel,
            in accordance with an undertaking and consent given by Dr. Nadel to the College
            of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario:

                  Effective  immediately,  Dr.  Mendel Robert Nadel shall not engage in any
                  professional encounters with female  patients in any jurisdiction, unless
                  the patient encounter takes place  in  the presence of a female regulated
                  health professional.

Previous Hearings

Committee: Discipline
Decision Date: 24 Oct 2003

 On October 24, 2003, the Discipline Committee found Dr. Nadel to have committed an act of professional 
 misconduct in that, he interrupted or terminated his relationship with a patient during delivery, which 
 having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, 
 dishonourable or unprofessional conduct. 
 The Committee ordered the following penalty: 
-Dr. Nadel attend before the panel to be reprimanded, with the fact of the reprimand to be recorded on the 
-The Registrar suspend Dr. Nadel’s certificate of registration for a period of three (3) months; the 
suspension is to be suspended if Dr. Nadel complies with the following terms and conditions within six 
(6) months from today’s date: 
-Dr. Nadel undertakes at his own expense an assessment by the Quality Assurance Committee (Q.A.C.), 
co-operates with their work and abides by the Q.A.C.’s recommendations and complies with any terms, 
conditions and limitations which the Q.A.C. may impose on his certificate of registration. 
 -Dr. Nadel undertakes at his own expense the communications course offered by the College. 
 -Dr. Nadel pay a portion of the College’s costs, fixed in the amount of $2500.00. 

Decision: Download Full Decision (PDF)
Appeal: No Appeal
Hearing Date(s): Jun 16, 2003


Source: ICR Committee
Active Date: October 14, 2016
Expiry Date:

A summary of a decision of the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee in which the disposition includes a "caution-in-person" is required by the College by-laws to be posted on the register, along with a note if the decision has been appealed. A “caution-in-person” disposition requires the physician to attend at the College and be verbally cautioned by a panel of the Committee. The summary will be removed from the register if the decision is overturned on appeal or review. Note that this requirement only applies to decisions arising out of a complaint dated on or after January 1, 2015 or if there was no complaint, the first appointment of investigators dated on or after January 1, 2015.
Download Full Document (PDF)